The texas vs texas a&m match player stats tell the story of one of the biggest games of the 2025 college football season. On November 28, 2025, the Texas Longhorns defeated the Texas A&M Aggies 27 to 17 at Darrell K Royal Texas Memorial Stadium in Austin, Texas. The victory gave Texas bragging rights in the Lone Star Showdown and handed Texas A&M its first loss of the season.
Texas A&M entered the rivalry game with an 11 and 0 record, while Texas looked to finish its regular season with a statement win. The Aggies held a 10 to 3 halftime lead, but Texas responded with a strong second half. Quarterback Arch Manning, running back Quintrevion Wisner, and the Longhorns defense helped turn the game around.
Manning finished with 179 passing yards and a passing touchdown, while Wisner rushed for 155 yards. Texas A&M quarterback Marcel Reed recorded 180 passing yards but threw two interceptions that hurt the Aggies during the decisive stretch.
This article breaks down the final score, passing statistics, rushing leaders, receiving numbers, defensive contributions, team statistics, and the key moments that decided the game.
Texas vs Texas A&M Match Player Stats at a Glance
Here are the main details from the November 28, 2025, rivalry matchup.
| Game Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Final score | Texas 27, Texas A&M 17 |
| Date | November 28, 2025 |
| Location | Austin, Texas |
| Stadium | Darrell K Royal Texas Memorial Stadium |
| Texas record entering game | 8 and 3 |
| Texas A&M record entering game | 11 and 0 |
| Texas starting quarterback | Arch Manning |
| Texas A&M starting quarterback | Marcel Reed |
| Texas leading rusher | Quintrevion Wisner |
| Texas leading receiver | Jack Endries |
| Texas A&M leading receiver | KC Concepcion |
Texas A&M started the game strongly and went into halftime with a seven point advantage. Texas then scored 10 points in the third quarter and added 14 more in the fourth to secure the win.
The Longhorns combined an effective running game with timely passing and defensive pressure. Texas A&M moved the ball at times, but its inability to protect the football became a major problem.
For the complete official player by player breakdown, see the Texas Athletics box score.
Final Score and Quarter by Quarter Breakdown
The scoring pattern explains how Texas overcame its early deficit.
| Quarter | Texas A&M | Texas |
|---|---|---|
| First quarter | 0 | 0 |
| Second quarter | 10 | 3 |
| Third quarter | 0 | 10 |
| Fourth quarter | 7 | 14 |
| Final | 17 | 27 |
First Quarter: Both Defenses Set the Tone
Neither team scored in the opening quarter. Both defenses limited early scoring opportunities, and the game began as a physical contest between two teams familiar with each other’s strengths.
Texas A&M looked to establish its offense through quarterback Marcel Reed and its running game. Texas worked to find openings through Arch Manning and its backfield.
The scoreless quarter set up a second period in which the Aggies found their offensive rhythm.
Second Quarter: Texas A&M Takes Control
Texas A&M scored 10 points in the second quarter while Texas managed a field goal. The Aggies went into halftime leading 10 to 3.
At that point, Texas A&M appeared to be in a strong position. The Aggies had an undefeated record and were trying to complete a perfect regular season.
Texas needed a better offensive performance after halftime. The Longhorns had to create more consistent rushing opportunities, make their passing game count, and prevent the Aggies from extending their lead.
Third Quarter: Texas Turns the Game Around
Texas scored 10 unanswered points in the third quarter, taking control of the game.
The Longhorns found better balance on offense, with Wisner providing important rushing production and Manning helping the team move the ball. Texas A&M, meanwhile, failed to score in the period.
The change in momentum gave Texas the confidence to enter the fourth quarter with a chance to pull away.
Fourth Quarter: Texas Seals the Victory
Texas added 14 points in the final quarter, while Texas A&M scored seven.
Manning delivered an important touchdown pass to Ryan Wingo, and his rushing ability created another major scoring opportunity. Texas A&M struggled to respond consistently, with interceptions becoming a significant part of the game’s closing stretch.
The Longhorns finished with a 27 to 17 victory, turning a seven point halftime deficit into a 10 point final margin.
Texas Player Stats: Arch Manning Leads the Offense
Arch Manning played a central role in Texas’ victory. He contributed through the air and on the ground, giving the Longhorns multiple ways to move the football.
Arch Manning Passing Stats
| Statistic | Total |
|---|---|
| Completions | 14 |
| Pass attempts | 31 |
| Completion percentage | 45.2% |
| Passing yards | 179 |
| Passing touchdowns | 1 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Longest completion | 54 yards |
Manning finished with 179 passing yards and one touchdown without throwing an interception. Although his overall completion percentage was below 50%, he made important plays when Texas needed to create scoring opportunities.
His ability to avoid interceptions was especially important against a Texas A&M team that had entered the game undefeated. By protecting the football, Manning gave his defense a chance to control the closing stages.
Manning also used his mobility to extend plays and create opportunities outside the pocket. His rushing contribution made him more difficult to defend because the Aggies had to account for both his passing and running ability.
Arch Manning Rushing Stats
| Statistic | Total |
|---|---|
| Rushing attempts | 7 |
| Rushing yards | 53 |
| Rushing touchdowns | 1 |
| Longest run | 35 yards |
Manning added 53 rushing yards and a touchdown. His 35 yard scoring run was one of the game’s most important offensive plays.
The rushing touchdown helped Texas extend its lead in the fourth quarter. It also showed how quarterback mobility can change the defensive approach late in a close game.
When a quarterback can gain yards on designed runs or scramble successfully, the defense must spread its attention across more potential ball carriers. That creates additional challenges for linebackers and defensive backs.
Why Manning’s Performance Mattered
Manning did not need to post a huge passing total to help Texas win. His value came from making timely plays, protecting possession, and contributing as a runner.
His performance also demonstrated the importance of complementary football. Wisner handled much of the rushing workload, while Manning added a passing touchdown and a rushing score.
That combination helped Texas produce 27 points against a team that had not lost during the regular season before the rivalry game.
Texas A&M Player Stats: Marcel Reed and the Aggies Offense
Marcel Reed led the Texas A&M offense against Texas. He produced 180 passing yards and contributed 71 rushing yards, but two interceptions became costly mistakes.
Marcel Reed Passing Stats
| Statistic | Total |
|---|---|
| Completions | 20 |
| Pass attempts | 32 |
| Completion percentage | 62.5% |
| Passing yards | 180 |
| Passing touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 2 |
| Longest completion | 28 yards |
Reed completed 20 of 32 passes, giving him a completion rate of 62.5%. His 180 passing yards were slightly higher than Manning’s total, but he did not throw a touchdown pass.
The two interceptions were the most damaging part of his performance. Against a strong opponent, turnovers can erase the value of otherwise productive drives.
Reed’s passing numbers show that Texas A&M was able to complete passes and gain yardage. The problem was turning those opportunities into reliable scoring drives without giving Texas additional possessions.
Marcel Reed Rushing Stats
| Statistic | Total |
|---|---|
| Rushing attempts | 12 |
| Rushing yards | 71 |
| Rushing touchdowns | 0 |
| Longest run | 20 yards |
Reed also contributed 71 rushing yards. His ability to run gave Texas A&M another way to attack the Longhorns defense.
His combined passing and rushing production made him an important part of the Aggies offense. However, the lack of a passing touchdown and the two interceptions limited the overall impact of his performance.
How the Texas Defense Limited Reed
Texas did not completely shut down Reed’s offense. The Aggies quarterback still generated 251 combined passing and rushing yards before accounting for any sack adjustments.
The Longhorns instead made several important stops and took advantage of opportunities to force turnovers. That approach helped Texas overcome Texas A&M’s early lead.
The key lesson from Reed’s performance is that total yardage does not always determine the winner. Teams must also protect possession, finish drives, and avoid costly errors in high pressure situations.
texas vs texas a&m match player stats: Quintrevion Wisner Dominates
Quintrevion Wisner was Texas’ leading offensive player by rushing yardage. He produced 155 net rushing yards and gave the Longhorns a consistent source of offense.
Texas Rushing Leaders
| Player | Attempts | Net Yards | Touchdowns | Longest Run |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quintrevion Wisner | 19 | 155 | 0 | 48 yards |
| Arch Manning | 7 | 53 | 1 | 35 yards |
| CJ Baxter Jr. | 6 | 10 | 0 | 7 yards |
| Nick Townsend | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 yards |
Wisner’s 155 yards on 19 carries made him the leading rusher in the game. He averaged 8.2 yards per attempt, giving Texas a major advantage on the ground.
His longest run covered 48 yards. Big gains like that can change field position quickly and put the opposing defense under pressure.
Manning’s 53 rushing yards added another dimension, while Townsend contributed a rushing touchdown. Together, the Longhorns created a balanced ground attack that helped them score 24 points in the second half.
Why Wisner Was So Important
Wisner gave Texas a dependable option when the passing game struggled to find consistency. His production helped the Longhorns sustain drives and reduce the pressure on Manning to make every play through the air.
The running game also helped Texas control the pace. Successful rushing plays can keep an offense ahead of the chains, create manageable third downs, and force defenders to respect the possibility of another handoff.
Wisner’s performance was one of the clearest statistical differences between the two teams. Texas finished with 218 net rushing yards, compared with 157 for Texas A&M.
texas vs texas a&m match player stats Rushing
Texas A&M used several players to generate rushing yards, with Reed leading the team in net production.
| Player | Attempts | Net Yards | Touchdowns | Longest Run |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcel Reed | 12 | 71 | 0 | 20 yards |
| Rueben Owens II | 13 | 48 | 0 | 10 yards |
| EJ Smith | 4 | 27 | 1 | 13 yards |
| KC Concepcion | 1 | 8 | 1 | 8 yards |
| Jamarion Morrow | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 yards |
| Mario Craver | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 yard |
The Aggies finished with 157 net rushing yards and two rushing touchdowns. EJ Smith scored on the ground, while Concepcion also contributed a rushing touchdown.
Rueben Owens II added 48 yards on 13 carries. His production helped Texas A&M maintain a running threat, but the Aggies did not generate as much net yardage as Texas.
The difference between the rushing totals was 61 yards in Texas’ favor. That advantage helped the Longhorns sustain their second half momentum.
Texas A&M’s running game was productive enough to contribute points, but it could not compensate for the turnovers and the team’s inability to score in the third quarter.
Texas Receiving Stats: Jack Endries Leads the Way
Jack Endries was Texas’ leading receiver in the matchup. He recorded 93 receiving yards on four catches, giving Manning a valuable target throughout the game.
Texas Receiving Leaders
| Player | Receptions | Receiving Yards | Touchdowns | Longest Catch |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jack Endries | 4 | 93 | 0 | 54 yards |
| Ryan Wingo | 4 | 34 | 1 | 29 yards |
| Quintrevion Wisner | 2 | 19 | 0 | 11 yards |
| Parker Livingstone | 1 | 19 | 0 | 19 yards |
| Emmett Mosley V | 1 | 9 | 0 | 9 yards |
| DeAndre Moore Jr. | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 yards |
| CJ Baxter Jr. | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 yard |
Endries’ 54 yard reception was the longest catch recorded by a Texas player in the game. His ability to gain significant yardage on a single play helped the Longhorns create opportunities downfield.
Wingo added four receptions for 34 yards and a touchdown. His scoring catch was an important moment in Texas’ second half comeback.
Wisner also contributed two catches for 19 yards, showing that his role extended beyond running the football.
Ryan Wingo’s Touchdown Contribution
Wingo’s touchdown gave Texas an important scoring play when the team needed to maintain momentum. He finished with four receptions, 34 receiving yards, and one receiving touchdown.
His contribution illustrated how a team can spread the workload across several players. Endries produced the most receiving yards, while Wingo provided a key scoring play.
Texas’ receiving numbers were not overwhelming, but the combination of Endries’ downfield production and Wingo’s touchdown helped the Longhorns make the most of their passing opportunities.
Texas A&M Receiving Stats: KC Concepcion Leads the Aggies
KC Concepcion led Texas A&M in receiving yards, finishing with five catches for 57 yards.
Texas A&M Receiving Leaders
| Player | Receptions | Receiving Yards | Touchdowns | Longest Catch |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KC Concepcion | 5 | 57 | 0 | 19 yards |
| Mario Craver | 5 | 44 | 0 | 14 yards |
| Theo Melin Öhrström | 3 | 43 | 0 | 28 yards |
| Ashton Bethel Roman | 2 | 17 | 0 | 11 yards |
| Nate Boerkircher | 1 | 8 | 0 | 8 yards |
| Rueben Owens II | 3 | 7 | 0 | 3 yards |
| Terry Bussey | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 yards |
Concepcion and Craver each caught five passes. Concepcion finished with 57 yards, while Craver added 44.
Melin Öhrström produced 43 yards on three receptions, including a 28 yard catch. His contribution gave Reed another option in the passing game.
Despite the receiving production, no Texas A&M player recorded a receiving touchdown. The Aggies relied on their running game for their two touchdowns.
That difference was important. Texas generated a passing touchdown through Wingo, while Texas A&M could not turn its passing production into a touchdown through the air.
Defensive Stats and Key Turnovers
Defense played a major role in Texas’ victory. The Longhorns made important stops, forced two interceptions, and prevented Texas A&M from scoring in the third quarter.
Key Defensive Contributions
Texas recorded two interceptions, both credited to its defensive unit in the official game statistics. Michael Taaffe recorded one interception, while other defenders helped limit the Aggies’ scoring opportunities.
Texas also recorded two sacks for a combined loss of 17 yards. The pressure helped disrupt Reed’s passing rhythm and made it more difficult for Texas A&M to sustain drives.
On the other side, Texas A&M recorded one sack for one yard. The Aggies also made defensive plays, but they could not prevent Texas from building its second half lead.
The official box score lists Liona Lefau with 11 total tackles for Texas, while Jelani McDonald and Ethan Burke each recorded nine. Colin Simmons added a sack and contributed pressure.
These defensive contributions helped Texas control the most important part of the game: the stretch after halftime when the Longhorns took the lead and protected it.
Why Turnovers Changed the Game
Texas A&M’s two interceptions were among the most costly moments of the matchup. Turnovers can stop a promising drive, change field position, and give the opponent an opportunity to score.
Texas avoided throwing an interception and made better use of its opportunities in the second half.
That contrast helped explain how the Longhorns won despite producing fewer passing yards than the Aggies.
Team Statistics: texas vs texas a&m match player stats
The team totals show how Texas gained its advantage through rushing, turnovers, and second half scoring.
| Team Statistic | Texas A&M | Texas |
|---|---|---|
| Passing yards | 180 | 179 |
| Net rushing yards | 157 | 218 |
| Rushing touchdowns | 2 | 2 |
| Passing touchdowns | 0 | 1 |
| Interceptions thrown | 2 | 0 |
| Sacks allowed | 1 | 2 |
| Third down conversions | 4 of 14 | 4 of 13 |
| Fourth down conversions | 1 of 1 | 0 of 0 |
| Time of possession | 32:15 | 27:45 |
| Final score | 17 | 27 |
Texas A&M held the ball for more than four additional minutes, but Texas still won by 10 points. That is a useful reminder that possession time alone does not determine a game’s outcome.
The Longhorns finished with 218 net rushing yards and 179 passing yards. Texas A&M produced 157 net rushing yards and 180 passing yards.
The passing totals were nearly identical, but Texas gained 61 more rushing yards and threw no interceptions. Those advantages helped Texas score 27 points while holding the Aggies to 17.
Both teams converted four third downs, although Texas faced one fewer attempt. The Longhorns also made the most of their red zone opportunities, scoring on both of their two chances.
Texas A&M reached the red zone five times and scored on three of those trips. The Aggies’ missed opportunities and turnovers made it harder to keep pace in the second half.
What the Player Stats Reveal About the Game
The numbers reveal three major reasons Texas won the rivalry matchup.
1. Texas Had the Better Running Game
Wisner’s 155 rushing yards gave Texas a major advantage. The Longhorns finished with 218 net rushing yards, compared with 157 for Texas A&M.
That extra production helped Texas create longer drives and maintain offensive balance.
2. Texas Protected the Football
Manning threw one touchdown and no interceptions. Reed threw for more passing yards, but he also threw two interceptions.
The difference in turnovers mattered because Texas could keep its offense on the field and force the Aggies to recover from costly mistakes.
3. Texas Played Its Best Football After Halftime
Texas A&M led 10 to 3 at halftime, but Texas scored 24 points in the second half. The Aggies managed only seven points after the break.
That change reflected Texas’ improved offensive execution and the defense’s ability to make important stops.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Texas vs Texas A&M football game in 2025?
Texas defeated Texas A&M 27 to 17 on November 28, 2025, at Darrell K Royal Texas Memorial Stadium in Austin.
What were Arch Manning’s stats against Texas A&M?
Manning completed 14 of 31 passes for 179 yards and one touchdown, with no interceptions. He also rushed seven times for 53 yards and one touchdown.
How many rushing yards did Quintrevion Wisner have?
Wisner recorded 155 net rushing yards on 19 carries. He averaged 8.2 yards per attempt and had a long run of 48 yards.
What were Marcel Reed’s stats against Texas?
Reed completed 20 of 32 passes for 180 yards with no passing touchdowns and two interceptions. He also rushed for 71 yards on 12 attempts.
Who led Texas in receiving yards?
Jack Endries led Texas with four receptions for 93 yards. His longest catch covered 54 yards.
Who led Texas A&M in receiving yards?
KC Concepcion led the Aggies with five catches for 57 yards. Mario Craver also caught five passes and finished with 44 yards.
How many interceptions did Texas record?
Texas recorded two interceptions against Texas A&M. Those turnovers helped the Longhorns limit the Aggies’ scoring opportunities.
What was the halftime score?
Texas A&M led Texas 10 to 3 at halftime. Texas then scored 10 points in the third quarter and 14 in the fourth to win 27 to 17.
Why did Texas win despite similar passing yardage?
Texas gained 61 more net rushing yards and avoided interceptions. The Longhorns also scored 24 second half points, while Texas A&M managed only seven.
Final Takeaway
The texas vs texas a&m match player stats show that the Longhorns won through a strong running game, timely scoring, and better ball security. Arch Manning contributed through the air and on the ground, while Quintrevion Wisner delivered the game’s biggest rushing performance with 155 yards.
Texas A&M had productive performances from Marcel Reed and KC Concepcion, but Reed’s two interceptions and the team’s scoreless third quarter proved costly. The Longhorns turned a 10 to 3 halftime deficit into a 27 to 17 victory.
For fans reviewing the rivalry, the official box score offers a clear picture of how Texas controlled the second half and ended Texas A&M’s undefeated regular season. The game also showed why rushing efficiency, turnover margin, and execution in key moments often matter more than passing yardage alone.
1 thought on “Texas vs.Texas A&M Match Player Stats: Full Game Breakdown”