The Thunder vs Spurs Match Player Statsopened their 2026–27 NBA regular season with an impressive 116–104 road victory over the San Antonio Spurs on October 20, 2026. The game took place at Frost Bank Center in San Antonio and brought extra attention because it was a rematch of the previous season’s Western Conference Finals.
Oklahoma City entered the matchup looking to establish itself as a championship contender again. San Antonio, meanwhile, wanted to make a strong statement in front of its home crowd. The contest featured several exciting young players, including Victor Wembanyama, Stephon Castle, and Dylan Harper.
The Thunder controlled much of the first half, built a significant lead, and then held off a determined Spurs comeback. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander delivered the strongest individual performance, scoring 32 points and contributing across multiple statistical categories.
Jared McCain also made a major impact off the bench, adding 20 points and six three-pointers. For San Antonio, Castle led the scoring with 24 points, while Wembanyama recorded 13 rebounds and six blocks despite struggling with his shooting.
Here is a detailed look at the player performances, team numbers, important moments, and biggest takeaways from the matchup.
Thunder vs Spurs Match Player Stats: Quick Box Score
Final Score: Oklahoma City Thunder 116, San Antonio Spurs 104
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma City Thunder | 34 | 31 | 28 | 23 | 116 |
| San Antonio Spurs | 28 | 16 | 36 | 24 | 104 |
Oklahoma City scored 65 points in the first half and entered halftime with a 21-point advantage. San Antonio responded after the break, scoring 36 points in the third quarter, but the Thunder maintained enough control to finish the game with a 12-point win.
Game Leaders
| Statistical Category | Oklahoma City | San Antonio |
|---|---|---|
| Leading scorer | Shai Gilgeous-Alexander — 32 | Stephon Castle — 24 |
| Leading rebounder | Chet Holmgren — 7 | Victor Wembanyama — 13 |
| Leading assist provider | Ajay Mitchell — 6 | De’Aaron Fox — 7 |
| Key bench scorer | Jared McCain — 20 | Keldon Johnson — 10 |
These performances show how both teams relied on different strengths. Oklahoma City received balanced scoring and strong outside shooting, while San Antonio found production from its young backcourt and defensive presence from Wembanyama.
Oklahoma City Thunder Player Stats
The Thunder had an effective team performance, with multiple players contributing on offense and defense. Gilgeous-Alexander led the way, but McCain’s shooting and Holmgren’s interior production were also important.
1. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander
- Points: 32
- Rebounds: 6
- Assists: 4
- Steals: 3
- Blocks: 3
- Field goals: 13-of-27
- Three-pointers: 3-of-7
- Free throws: 3-of-4
Gilgeous-Alexander was Oklahoma City’s leading scorer and the most influential offensive player in the matchup. He finished with 32 points, six rebounds, and four assists while also recording three steals and three blocks.
His ability to score from different areas of the floor made it difficult for San Antonio to contain him. He attacked the basket, created opportunities in isolation, and converted important shots when the Spurs tried to reduce the deficit.
His defensive contributions were equally valuable. Three steals and three blocks showed that his impact extended beyond scoring.
2. Jared McCain
- Points: 20
- Rebounds: 3
- Assists: 2
- Steals: 1
- Field goals: 7-of-9
- Three-pointers: 6-of-8
McCain delivered one of the biggest supporting performances for Oklahoma City. He scored 20 points in just over 22 minutes and connected on six three-point attempts.
His shooting helped the Thunder maintain their offensive advantage. Whenever San Antonio needed a defensive stop, McCain’s ability to create space and hit shots from the perimeter made the challenge more difficult.
His 7-of-9 field-goal performance was especially efficient. Six successful three-pointers also tied his career high, making his contribution one of the standout stories of the game.
3. Chet Holmgren
- Points: 14
- Rebounds: 7
- Assists: 2
- Blocks: 4
- Field goals: 3-of-8
- Free throws: 8-of-8
Holmgren provided important interior production. He finished with 14 points, seven rebounds, and four blocks.
Although his field-goal numbers were not especially high, he made the most of his opportunities at the free-throw line, converting all eight attempts.
His defensive presence helped Oklahoma City challenge shots around the basket. Against a team featuring Wembanyama, having a reliable rim protector was particularly important.
4. Jalen Williams
- Points: 12
- Rebounds: 7
- Assists: 2
- Steals: 1
- Blocks: 1
- Field goals: 5-of-16
- Three-pointers: 1-of-2
Williams contributed 12 points and seven rebounds. His shooting was less efficient than some of his teammates, but he remained involved in several areas of the game.
His rebounding and defensive activity helped Oklahoma City maintain balance. The Thunder did not need every player to produce a high-scoring performance because their offense received contributions from several different positions.
5. Alex Caruso
- Points: 9
- Rebounds: 6
- Assists: 1
- Steals: 1
- Field goals: 3-of-4
- Three-pointers: 2-of-2
Caruso made an efficient contribution in limited offensive opportunities. He converted all two of his three-point attempts and added six rebounds.
His defensive experience and ability to make smart plays also helped the Thunder manage the game. Players like Caruso are valuable because they can contribute without needing many possessions.
Other Thunder Player Performances
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Blocks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cason Wallace | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| Jaylin Williams | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 |
| Isaiah Hartenstein | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
| Ajay Mitchell | 4 | 5 | 6 | 0 |
| Aday Mara | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Kenrich Williams | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Brooks Barnhizer | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bennett Stirtz | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Ajay Mitchell deserves attention for his six assists. Although he scored only four points, he helped create opportunities for teammates and supported the Thunder’s ball movement.
Aday Mara also contributed seven points in limited playing time, giving Oklahoma City another useful option in the rotation.
San Antonio Spurs Player Stats
The Spurs had several productive individual performances, but their slow start made the game difficult. San Antonio scored only 44 points in the first half and had to spend much of the second half trying to recover.
Stephon Castle led the team in scoring, while Wembanyama controlled the boards and protected the rim.
1. Stephon Castle
- Points: 24
- Rebounds: 7
- Assists: 1
- Field goals: 9-of-21
- Three-pointers: 5-of-12
- Free throws: 1-of-1
Castle was San Antonio’s leading scorer with 24 points. He also collected seven rebounds and connected on five three-pointers.
His perimeter shooting helped the Spurs remain competitive after their difficult first half. Castle showed that he could create scoring opportunities even when the Thunder applied defensive pressure.
His performance was one of the biggest positives for San Antonio, especially considering the team’s overall offensive struggles.
2. Dylan Harper
- Points: 18
- Rebounds: 7
- Assists: 5
- Field goals: 7-of-17
- Three-pointers: 0-of-2
- Free throws: 4-of-4
Harper added 18 points, seven rebounds, and five assists. His all-around performance helped San Antonio find additional offense beyond Castle.
He showed the ability to create shots and contribute as a playmaker. His five assists were particularly useful as the Spurs attempted to improve their offensive rhythm.
Although he did not make a three-pointer, his work inside the arc and at the free-throw line helped him produce a strong scoring total.
3. De’Aaron Fox
- Points: 14
- Rebounds: 7
- Assists: 7
- Steals: 1
- Field goals: 6-of-9
- Three-pointers: 0-of-2
Fox finished with 14 points, seven rebounds, and seven assists. His playmaking was an important part of the Spurs’ second-half response.
He helped create opportunities for teammates and provided another reliable ball handler. His efficient two-point shooting also gave San Antonio a positive offensive option.
Fox’s seven assists tied him for the team’s highest total in the game.
4. Victor Wembanyama
- Points: 12
- Rebounds: 13
- Assists: 3
- Steals: 1
- Blocks: 6
- Field goals: 1-of-13
- Free throws: 10-of-12
Wembanyama had a mixed performance. His offensive shooting was difficult, as he made only one of his 13 field-goal attempts. However, he still finished with 12 points because he converted 10 free throws.
His defensive numbers were outstanding. He collected 13 rebounds and recorded six blocks, making him a major presence around the basket.
The contrast between his shooting and defensive production was one of the most interesting aspects of the matchup. Even on a difficult offensive night, he affected the game through rebounding and rim protection.
5. Keldon Johnson
- Points: 10
- Rebounds: 4
- Assists: 1
- Steals: 2
- Field goals: 4-of-8
- Three-pointers: 1-of-2
Johnson added 10 points and four rebounds. He also recorded two steals, providing useful defensive energy.
His shooting efficiency helped San Antonio receive some scoring support outside its leading players.
Other Spurs Player Performances
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Blocks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julian Champagnie | 8 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| Devin Vassell | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| Luke Kornet | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Harrison Barnes | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Champagnie contributed three blocks, giving San Antonio another useful defensive option. Vassell added seven points, while Kornet and Barnes also scored.
The Spurs received scoring from several players, but they needed greater shooting efficiency from their primary offensive options to challenge Oklahoma City for all four quarters.
Team Statistics: Thunder vs Spurs Match Player Stats
Individual performances tell only part of the story. Team statistics explain why Oklahoma City won and where San Antonio struggled.
| Team Statistic | Thunder | Spurs |
|---|---|---|
| Total points | 116 | 104 |
| Field goals | 43-of-95 | 36-of-93 |
| Field-goal percentage | 45.3% | 38.7% |
| Three-pointers | 14-of-31 | 10-of-37 |
| Three-point percentage | 45.2% | 27.0% |
| Free throws | 16-of-20 | 22-of-25 |
| Free-throw percentage | 80.0% | 88.0% |
| Total rebounds | 47 | 45 |
| Assists | 24 | 21 |
| Steals | 8 | 6 |
| Blocks | 10 | 11 |
| Turnovers | 14 | 14 |
Oklahoma City had the advantage in field-goal percentage, three-point shooting, assists, and total rebounds. San Antonio was more accurate at the free-throw line and recorded one additional block.
The biggest difference came from outside shooting. The Thunder made 14 three-pointers at a 45.2% rate, while the Spurs connected on 10 at 27%.
That four-shot difference from beyond the arc was important in a game decided by 12 points.
How the Game Unfolded
First Quarter: Oklahoma City Takes Control
The Thunder started aggressively and scored 34 points in the opening period. San Antonio managed 28, but Oklahoma City had already established a six-point advantage.
Gilgeous-Alexander helped set the offensive tone, while the Thunder’s perimeter players created additional scoring opportunities.
The Spurs were competitive, but they needed to improve their defensive coverage and prevent Oklahoma City from finding comfortable three-point attempts.
Second Quarter: Thunder Build a Big Lead
The second quarter was the most important stretch of the game. Oklahoma City scored 31 points and limited San Antonio to just 16.
The Thunder’s shooting from beyond the arc played a major role. Their offense moved effectively, and they took advantage of San Antonio’s defensive problems.
By halftime, Oklahoma City led 65–44. The 21-point advantage gave the visitors control of the matchup and put pressure on the Spurs to respond after the break.
Third Quarter: Spurs Fight Back
San Antonio showed more energy in the third quarter. The Spurs scored 36 points and reduced the deficit by winning the period 36–28.
Castle, Harper, and Fox helped the home team improve its offensive production. Wembanyama also continued to affect the game defensively.
The comeback made the contest more competitive, but Oklahoma City still entered the fourth quarter with a 93–80 lead.
Fourth Quarter: Thunder Protect the Win
The Spurs continued to compete in the final period, scoring 24 points. However, Oklahoma City answered with 23 and maintained its advantage.
The Thunder avoided a complete collapse and made enough plays to finish the game with a 116–104 victory.
Their strong first-half performance proved too difficult for San Antonio to overcome.
Why the Oklahoma City Thunder Won
Several factors explain Oklahoma City’s opening-night success.
1. Better Three-Point Shooting
The Thunder converted 14 three-pointers, compared with 10 for San Antonio. They also shot more accurately from long range.
This helped Oklahoma City build its first-half advantage and gave the offense another way to score when the Spurs defended the paint.
2. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander Led the Offense
Gilgeous-Alexander finished with a game-high 32 points. His scoring ability forced San Antonio to focus on him, creating opportunities for other Thunder players.
His defensive numbers also made the performance more complete.
3. Jared McCain Provided Important Bench Scoring
McCain’s 20 points were a major contribution. His six made three-pointers gave Oklahoma City another perimeter threat and helped maintain its offensive rhythm.
A strong bench performance can make a major difference in a competitive NBA game, and McCain delivered exactly that.
4. Oklahoma City Started Faster
The Thunder’s 65–44 halftime lead was arguably the most important part of the game.
San Antonio played better after halftime, but the early deficit meant the Spurs had very little room for mistakes.
Why the San Antonio Spurs Lost
San Antonio had several positive individual performances, but three issues made the difference.
1. Poor Field-Goal Efficiency
The Spurs made only 36 of 93 field-goal attempts. Their 38.7% shooting percentage was lower than Oklahoma City’s 45.3%.
The biggest individual concern was Wembanyama’s 1-of-13 shooting performance.
2. Difficult Second Quarter
Scoring only 16 points in the second quarter put San Antonio in a difficult position.
The Spurs had to spend the second half chasing a large deficit instead of playing with a lead or a close score.
3. Perimeter Defense
Oklahoma City made 14 three-pointers. San Antonio’s 27% three-point shooting also meant the Spurs could not match the Thunder’s perimeter production.
Better defensive coverage and more consistent outside shooting would have helped San Antonio stay closer.
Key Takeaways From the Matchup
The game offered several important lessons about both teams.
Oklahoma City has multiple scoring options. Gilgeous-Alexander led the way, but McCain, Holmgren, and Williams also contributed. That balance makes the Thunder difficult to defend.
McCain’s shooting can change a game. His six three-pointers provided a major offensive boost and showed how important bench production can be.
Castle continues to be an important offensive option. His 24 points led San Antonio and gave the Spurs a reliable scoring presence.
Wembanyama remains a major defensive force. His six blocks and 13 rebounds showed how much he can contribute even when his field-goal shooting is not working.
First-half execution matters. San Antonio’s second-half improvement was encouraging, but the 21-point halftime deficit was too large to overcome.
Thunder vs Spurs Match Player Stats: What the Numbers Tell Us
The statistical comparison makes the result easier to understand. Oklahoma City won because it combined efficient shooting with balanced scoring and a strong opening half.
Gilgeous-Alexander was the standout performer with 32 points, six rebounds, and four assists. McCain’s 20 points gave the Thunder an additional offensive weapon, while Holmgren contributed 14 points, seven rebounds, and four blocks.
San Antonio had its own impressive performances. Castle finished with 24 points, Harper scored 18, and Fox recorded 14 points with seven assists. Wembanyama added 13 rebounds and six blocks.
However, the Spurs struggled to convert their field-goal attempts. Their 38.7% shooting was not enough to keep pace with Oklahoma City’s 45.3%.
The Thunder also made four more three-pointers, which helped create the scoring separation.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who won the Thunder vs Spurs Match Player Stats game on October 20, 2026?
The Oklahoma City Thunder defeated the San Antonio Spurs 116–104. The game took place at Frost Bank Center in San Antonio.
2. How many points did Shai Gilgeous-Alexander score?
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander scored 32 points. He also recorded six rebounds, four assists, three steals, and three blocks.
3. Who was the leading scorer for the San Antonio Spurs?
Stephon Castle led San Antonio with 24 points. He also collected seven rebounds and made five three-pointers.
4. How many points did Victor Wembanyama score?
Victor Wembanyama scored 12 points. He also recorded 13 rebounds, three assists, and six blocks.
5. How many points did Jared McCain score?
Jared McCain scored 20 points for Oklahoma City. He made seven of nine field-goal attempts, including six three-pointers.
6. What was the halftime score?
Oklahoma City led San Antonio 65–44 at halftime. The Thunder outscored the Spurs 31–16 in the second quarter.
7. Which team made more three-pointers?
Oklahoma City made 14 three-pointers, while San Antonio made 10. The Thunder also had the better three-point percentage, shooting 45.2%.
8. How many blocks did Wembanyama record?
Wembanyama recorded six blocks. He was one of San Antonio’s most important defensive players despite his difficult shooting night.
9. Where was the Thunder vs Spurs game played?
The game was played at Frost Bank Center in San Antonio, Texas, the home arena of the Spurs.
10. Why did Oklahoma City beat San Antonio?
Oklahoma City won because of stronger first-half scoring, more efficient shooting, and better three-point production. The Thunder also received important contributions from Gilgeous-Alexander and McCain.
Final Thoughts
The October 20 matchup between Oklahoma City and San Antonio delivered an entertaining start to the 2026–27 NBA season. The Thunder earned a 116–104 road victory by combining strong perimeter shooting, balanced scoring, and an impressive first-half performance.
Gilgeous-Alexander was the clear star with 32 points, while Jared McCain’s 20-point performance provided a major boost. Holmgren also made an impact with 14 points and four blocks.
For the Spurs, Castle’s 24 points and Wembanyama’s 13 rebounds and six blocks were important highlights. Harper and Fox also contributed offensively, but San Antonio’s shooting struggles made a comeback difficult.
The result showed that Oklahoma City could remain dangerous through multiple scoring options, while the Spurs still had plenty of reasons to build on their second-half response.
For readers following the teams, this matchup offered a useful early-season look at the strengths, weaknesses, and individual performances that could shape their 2026–27 campaigns.
Sources for box-score verification: The official NBA game summary provides the final score and game recap; the detailed player tables are cross-checked against the game box score and contemporaneous coverage. NBA.com+3
1 thought on “Thunder vs Spurs Match Player Stats: Top Performers, and Game Recap”